Home
Confidential

« The Talking Dutchman | Main | Crowded Offices»


My picture!

In the comments to my last blog entry, nobody asked an interesting question: how do we know that activity in the forums correlates with success at poker? 

As we are not the poker operators themselves, we do not know how successful specific individual players in our community are. But: we know that most of our players do not deposit own money & either build up their bankroll on the initial free $50 - or fail.

That means: at least 90% of those players with many StrategyPoints are also successful. Now it is an easy task to compare activity in the forums with the amount of StrategyPoints. And there we see it: community members with at least 1 forum post are statistically 10 times more successful than those with 0 forum posts.

 

Total Forum Activity

In 2007, a total of 1,414,961 forum posts were written on PokerStrategy.com. In 2008, that rocketed to 3,704,050. A growth rate of more than 160%!

Comparing our different languages also looks interesting. Of course, German as the oldest community still dominates the forum activity. But quite some other languages are catching up! I hope 2009 will see at least 4 communities with more than 500,000 forum posts. Very optimist, I know :)

Language Code – Amount of Posts in '08

DE – 2,225,435
RU – 334,138
ES – 177,780
FR – 156,872
HU – 148,484
EN – 137,567
PL – 116,245
NL – 111,280
IT – 107,178
PT – 91,450
ZH – 63,324
FI – 20,868
KO – 9,356
SV – 6,378

 

Edit: Thanks topchami for catching my error. Portugese of course got 91,450 posts, not 9,145 :)

6 Comments | "Postcount 2008" »

unknown

topchami : portuguese posts

01/01/2009, at 16:56 [ Reply ]

amount of posts in portuguese is 9,145 or 91,450? bye

unknown

xantos :

01/01/2009, at 19:23 [ Reply ]

Edited, thanks! :)
unknown

ottow :

02/01/2009, at 18:05 [ Reply ]

english for insiders!

unknown

Nobody :

02/01/2009, at 21:31 [ Reply ]

I wouldn't call someone with only 1 forum post an "active member".
So how do the statistics look like, if you compare those having 100+, 300+, 500+ oder 1000+ forum posts with the others?
I think, there are a lot of very "active" members, who aren't successfull at all, but spamming in non-poker-relevant forums i.e. BBV like hell.

xantos

xantos :

02/01/2009, at 23:15 [ Reply ]

Well, "active members" is just a term here. Of course members with 100+ posts or even more will be even way more above-average, but that does not tell too much: the causality could just be vice-versa.

I.e.: Only if you are successful you will stay long enough to get the chance to write 100+ posts etc.

So the big gap between 0-posters and 1+posters is the most meaningful - and even there it could just be a correlation.

unknown

extreme :

27/03/2009, at 12:59 [ Reply ]

As we are not the poker operators themselves, we do not know how successful specific individual players in our community are. But: we know that most of our players do not deposit own money & either build up their bankroll on the initial free $50 - or fail.

How do you know most players dont deposit their own money?

Add comment

Add comment

Recent Articles

Strategy-Blogs

Poker-Blogs

Userblogs

Recent Comments

Search

calendar

« July 2009 »
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

archives

Categories

login

username:
password:
Password forgotten?

RSS-Feed

  • RSS 1.0
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom 0.3